News

Stay updated with the latest research and technology news

72,959 articles
EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law

CELEX:62025TJ0046:           Urteil des Gerichts (Sechste Kammer) vom 28. Januar 2026.#Land Oberösterreich gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Verfallsverfahren – Unionswortmarke Genussländer – Ernsthafte Benutzung der Marke – Art. 18 Abs. 1 Buchst. a und Art. 58 Abs. 1 Buchst. a der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Art der Benutzung der Marke – Form, die in Bestandteilen abweicht, durch die die Unterscheidungskraft nicht beeinflusst wird.#Rechtssache T-46/25.

This document does not exist in English.

EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law

CELEX:62025CO0146_INF: Order of the Court of 25 June 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-146/25 P.

European Affairs Software
EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law

CELEX:62024TO0545_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (première chambre) du 20 novembre 2025.#Implementing Technologies, SL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de déchéance – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative OSSA – Recours incident – Absence d’intérêt à agir – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-545/24.

This document does not exist in English.

Technology
EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law

CELEX:62025CO0597: Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/25 P.

European Affairs Software
EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law

CELEX:62025CO0598: Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/25 P.

European Affairs Software
EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law

CELEX:62025CO0044_INF: Order of the Court of 1 October 2025.#Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-44/25 P.

European Affairs Software
EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law EUR-Lex CJEU Case Law

CELEX:62024TJ0557_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Confrasilvas - Construções S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Confrasilvas – Earlier sign Confrasilvas – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-557/24.

European Affairs Software